Embracing Divine Tension in Conflict (Part 7)

Justin Renton • June 1, 2026

In every major conflict, whether political, personal, or spiritual, there is almost always a sliver of validity on both sides. Grievances are real. Injustices are felt. Leaders on the “wrong” side can even articulate legitimate frustrations. Yet the Bible repeatedly shows that siding with the compelling but ultimately rebellious side leads to ruin. This is the principle of divine tension: the narrow path of discernment that refuses to be seduced by partial truths or misplaced empathy. It demands we look beyond the immediate narrative and align with God’s bigger picture.

Siding on the wrong side of conflicts

The pages of Scripture reveal a deep, eternal danger of siding with half-truths: the spiritual ruin of those who mistake human empathy for divine alignment. Consider Korah’s rebellion in Numbers 16. Korah, Dathan, Abiram, and 250 respected leaders rose against Moses and Aaron. Their complaint sounded reasonable, even spiritual: “You have gone too far! The whole community is holy, every one of them, and the Lord is with them. Why then do you set yourselves above the Lord’s assembly?” – Numbers 16:3. There was a kernel of truth here. God had indeed declared the entire nation “a kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Exodus 19:6). Many Israelites likely felt genuine frustration with leadership that sometimes seemed heavy-handed. Empathy for the “common people” against the “elite” would have felt righteous. Yet God’s response was swift and terrifying: the earth opened and swallowed Korah, his followers, and their households alive. The next day, when the people grumbled in misplaced sympathy for the rebels, “You have killed the Lord’s people,” a plague killed 14,700 more (Numbers 16:41-49). The small degree of validity in their complaint did not justify rebellion.


A second biblical case is equally instructive. Ahithophel, one of King David’s most trusted counselors, joined Absalom’s coup against his own king (2 Samuel 15-17). Ahithophel had personal reasons that carried emotional weight. He was Bathsheba’s grandfather. David’s adultery and the murder of Uriah had devastated his family. When Absalom rebelled, Ahithophel’s counsel to him was brilliant and almost succeeded. From a purely human perspective, his decision looked like justice, righteous indignation against a king who had sinned grievously. There was undeniable validity to his grievance. Yet Ahithophel sided against the man God had anointed. When his advice was later rejected, he went home, set his affairs in order, and hanged himself (2 Samuel 17:23). Personal pain, however legitimate, had blinded him to the bigger picture: David remained God’s chosen instrument. God had forgiven David, Ahithophel did not! (Note: siding with God’s “anointed order” does not mean excusing the leader’s sin, but rather trusting God’s method for addressing that sin rather than joining a rebellion.)


Another sobering example comes from the spy mission in Numbers 13-14. Twelve leaders were sent to scout the Promised Land. Ten returned overwhelmed by what they saw: “The people who live there are powerful, and the cities are fortified and very large…We even saw descendants of Anak there” – Numbers 13:28. Their fears were not fabricated; the obstacles were genuinely intimidating, the enemy strong. The entire congregation, gripped by faithlessness and probable empathy for their wives and children and a desire to avoid slaughter, sided with the majority report. They wept aloud, grumbled against Moses and Aaron, and even said, “If only we had died in Egypt! Or in this wilderness! …Wouldn’t it be better for us to go back to Egypt?” – Numbers 14:2-3. Joshua and Caleb pleaded with them to trust God’s promise, declaring, “The Lord is with us. Do not be afraid of them” – Numbers 14:9. But the people’s emotional alignment with the “realistic” and “compassionate” view of danger prevailed. The spies had literally “deconstructed” the faith of the Israelites! God’s verdict was devastating: that entire generation would wander in the desert for forty years and die there, never entering the land (Numbers 14:28-35). A small degree of validity in their fear became the doorway to unbelief and national tragedy.


These stories illustrate why the Bible insists on discernment rather than emotional alignment. Partial truths and real hurts are the very tools the enemy uses to draw people onto the wrong side. Scripture therefore commands us to cultivate spiritual clarity.


Scriptures on discernment

Knowing which scriptures or biblical principles to apply to the situations you are facing requires wisdom, training, prayer and hearts aligned with God’s purposes (emphasis added in scriptures below).


  • But solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil – Hebrews 5:14.
  • And this is my prayer: that your love may abound more and more in knowledge and depth of insight, so that you may be able to discern what is best and may be pure and blameless for the day of Christ – Philippians 1:9-10.
  • So give your servant a discerning heart to govern your people and to distinguish between right and wrong – 1 Kings 3:9.
  • Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world – 1 John 4:1.


Discernment does not silence the prophetic voice, it guides it; the Old Testament prophets confronted corrupt kings directly, but they did so as God’s messengers, not as rebels joining an opposing faction.


The dangers of misplaced empathy

Misplaced empathy, the compassionate pull toward someone’s pain, fear, or grievance without submitting it to God’s truth, is one of the most subtle and deadly snares in spiritual conflicts. It feels virtuous. It whispers, “They have a point,” or “How can we ignore their suffering?” Yet the Bible repeatedly warns that unchecked human empathy can lead us to oppose God himself. Real emotion is never dismissed, but it must be filtered through discernment. This discernment also helps us distinguish between spiritual and worldly causes. Immigration, wars, and evil governments belong to a category of their own — and failing to separate the eternal from the temporal can pull us down the wrong path.


We see this danger in one of Jesus’ closest followers. When Jesus began predicting His own suffering and death, “Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him. ‘Never, Lord!’ he said. ‘This shall never happen to you!’” – Matthew 16:22. Peter’s words flowed from deep love and protective empathy; he could not bear to see his Master suffer. Yet Jesus turned and said, “Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the concerns of God, but merely human concerns” – Matthew 16:23. Even the most sincere human empathy, when it stands against God’s redemptive plan, becomes satanic opposition.


To be clear, we are called to empathy for all image-bearers, but never at the expense of aligning with rebellion or evil. True biblical empathy is expansive and compassionate, reflecting the heart of Christ who sympathizes with our weaknesses (Hebrews 4:15) and commands us to love even our enemies (Matthew 5:43-48). It means acknowledging real pain, legitimate fears, and genuine grievances on every side. However, empathy becomes misplaced and dangerous when it leads us to justify rebellion, to excuse sin, or to stand against his anointed purposes.


The Bible therefore equips us with clear warnings against letting empathy override truth:


  • In a lawsuit the first to speak seems right, until someone comes forward and cross-examines – Proverbs 18:17.
  • There is a way that appears to be right, but in the end it leads to death –Proverbs 14:12.
  • Do not follow the crowd in doing wrong – Exodus 23:2.


Misplaced empathy feels virtuous and before we know it, we are marching with Korah’s company, weeping with the ten spies, or rebuking the Son of God himself. Divine tension demands we hold the tension: acknowledge the grievance, feel the pain, yet submit every narrative to the light of God’s Word and his anointed order. Only then can we avoid the tragic irony of being right about a small truth while fatally wrong about the bigger picture.


The danger of meddling

One of the most practical warnings the Bible gives about navigating conflict is found in Proverbs 26:17: “Whoever meddles in a quarrel not his own is like one who grabs a dog by the ears.”


Imagine seizing a snarling dog by both ears. For a brief moment you may feel in control, but you are now locked in a dangerous position. You cannot safely let go, and the dog is furious. The longer you hold on, the more likely you are to be bitten. This is exactly what happens when we allow ourselves to be pulled into disputes, grievances, or rebellions that do not directly concern us, or our God-given sphere of responsibility.


In the stories we have already examined, many people were not the primary instigators yet still suffered devastating consequences because they grabbed the dog by the ears:


  • The Israelites who sympathized with Korah after the earth swallowed the rebels.
  • The congregation that joined the 10 spies in their fear.
  • The crowd that was stirred by the chief priests to choose Barabbas over Jesus.
  • Aaron, who yielded to the pressure of the people while Moses was on the mountain.


Each group stepped into a conflict that was not primarily theirs to resolve. Their empathy or desire to “do something” locked them into a position from which they could not gracefully withdraw, and they paid a heavy price.


How to avoid the “dog by the ears” trap

Divine tension requires us to hold real grievances and real pain in one hand, while firmly refusing to seize what is not ours in the other. Here are concrete ways to apply this proverb:


  1. Ask the ownership question before engaging: Is this quarrel mine to own, or am I stepping into someone else’s fight?
  2. Distinguish empathy from enlistment – You can acknowledge someone’s pain (“I see this is really hard”) without picking up their banner. Practical phrase: “I hear you, and I’m praying with you. But I’m not in a position to judge or join this battle.” This honors the person without grabbing the dog’s ears.
  3. Set clear boundaries on social and digital involvement
  • Do not forward, like, or amplify inflammatory content in a conflict you are not responsible to resolve. Resist the urge to “weigh in” on every church, family or political dispute trending online.
  • Remember: silence is often the most discerning response.


4. Know when to release – If you have already grabbed the ears (i.e., you have already gotten involved or deeply aligned yourself), the wise move is a humble release as soon as possible: “I realize I spoke or aligned too quickly. This is not my fight to lead. I’m stepping back and trusting God with the outcome.” Pride keeps people holding the dog; humility lets them let go.


The principle of divine tension is not cold detachment, it is Spirit-led engagement within proper boundaries. Grabbing a dog by the ears feels like courageous involvement; in reality, it is often presumptuous meddling that God never asked for. 1 Peter 4:15 (ESV, emphasis added): “But let none of you suffer as a murderer or a thief or an evildoer or as a meddler.” Peter lists being a meddler alongside murder, theft and evil doing. Yikes!


By refusing to seize every quarrel that tugs at our heartstrings, we stay on the narrow path. We acknowledge real pain. We feel legitimate grief. But we do not allow partial truths or misplaced empathy to drag us into rebellion, division, or ruin. The dog keeps snarling, but we remain free, hands open, eyes fixed on Jesus, walking in discernment rather than drama.


As a litmus test, whenever you are drawn to side with a conflict ask yourself:


  • Does this “valid point” require me to ignore a clear biblical command?
  • Am I empathizing with a person’s pain and aligning with it at the expense of God’s will and holiness?
  • Is my desire for perceived “justice” in this moment actually a form of rebellion against something God is allowing to happen?
  • Does siding with this conflict produce the fruit of the Spirit (peace, love, self-control) or does it primarily fuel anger, frustration and division? 
  • If my grievance is addressed, am I willing to remain under this leadership, or is my real goal the dismantling of the authority itself?


The divine tension we must navigate is the narrow path of spiritual discernment that acknowledges real grievances, partial truths, and legitimate human pain or empathy in a conflict, yet steadfastly refuses to let them seduce one into rebellion.


Living in the tension

Not all conflict has a clear right or wrong. Romans 14 tells us there are indeed disputable matters, where we can differ with each other and be “OK.” However, in an age of polarized conflicts (political, cultural, and personal) the principle of divine tension remains as urgent as ever. We are called to empathy for all people and Jesus himself modeled this perfectly: He wept over Jerusalem, ate with sinners, and showed compassion to the suffering, yet He never compromised truth, never excused sin, and never joined rebellion against the Father’s will.


So, the next time you feel the pull toward one side because your heart aches in empathy, pause. Ask the Holy Spirit for the discerning heart Solomon sought. The small validity may be real, but the Bible’s bigger picture is decisive. Side with truth, even when it costs you popularity, sympathy, or apparent justice. In the end, only God’s side stands.


Table of biblical examples: siding on the wrong side of conflicts

Biblical figure/group Conflict against Possible reasons Key scripture Consequence
Korah, Dathan, Abiram & 250 leaders Moses & Aaron’s leadership Spiritual claim of equality (partial truth); empathy for “common people” against “elite” leaders Numbers 16:1-3, 41 Swallowed by earth; plague killed 14,700 more
Ahithophel David (joined Absalom’s rebellion) Personal family grudge (Bathsheba’s grandfather); righteous anger at David’s sin 2 Samuel 15:12; 17:23 Advice rejected; suicide
Ten spies & Israelite congregation Entering the Promised Land Genuine fear of powerful enemies; empathy for families’ safety and avoiding slaughter Numbers 13:28-33; 14:1-4 40 years of wilderness wandering; generation died
King Saul God’s command to destroy the Amalekites Misplaced mercy for defeated King Agag; empathy for valuable livestock (pragmatic “sacrifice” rationale) 1 Samuel 15:9, 22 Kingdom torn from him
Simon Peter Jesus’ predicted suffering and death Deep protective love; horror at the thought of his Master’s pain Matthew 16:22-23 Rebuked as “Satan” and a stumbling block
Aaron God’s clear law (while Moses was on the mountain) Pressure from impatient people; misplaced empathy for their fear and desire for a visible god Exodus 32:1-5 3,000 Israelites killed; Aaron publicly rebuked
Elders of Israel God’s direct rule as King Fear of surrounding nations; desire to be “like all the other nations”; misplaced empathy for human security 1 Samuel 8:4-5, 19-20 Received Saul; led to unfaithful kings and division
Chief priests, elders & the crowd Jesus (demanded Barabbas instead) Envy of Jesus’ influence; nationalistic “empathy” for anti-Roman rebel fighter Matthew 27:20 Jesus crucified; later national judgment (AD 70)
Judas Iscariot Jesus (betrayed Him to authorities) Greed; disillusionment with non-political Messiah; possible misplaced “justice” for the poor John 12:4-6; Matthew 26:14-16 Suicide; eternal condemnation
400 prophets of Ahab God’s truth (prophesied victory to please king) Desire for royal favour and position; peer pressure; empathy for king’s war ambitions 1 Kings 22:6, 11-12 Ahab defeated and killed; prophets exposed
By Justin Renton August 4, 2026
In the messy arena of human relationships, whether in marriage, the workplace, church family, or the volatile world of online discourse, we constantly feel the pull of opposing forces. One voice urges us to defend truth fiercely; another calls us to extend grace generously. This is the divine tension of disagreement: holding both conviction and compassion without letting go of either. Today, we turn to a passage that cuts to the heart of how we handle differences: “My dear brothers and sisters, take note of this: Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry, because human anger does not produce the righteousness that God desires.” – James 1:19-20 (NIV) James, writing to scattered believers across the nations, doesn’t offer fluffy advice. He gives a practical, counter-cultural blueprint for godly relationships: Be quick to listen. Slow to speak. Slow to anger. These aren’t suggestions for better conversations; they are directives for producing the righteousness God desires. This passage applies to husbands and wives, children and parents, bosses and workers; everyone from the pulpit to the pew. We all need to train ourselves to be better listeners. The divine tension in James’ command Here lies the tension: Listening requires humility and self-control, while speaking (especially in defense of truth) feels urgent. Anger can arise when we perceive injustice or error, yet James holds these in balance. We must lean into listening first, restrain our tongues, and guard our hearts against hasty wrath. Why? Because “human anger does not produce the righteousness that God desires.” This isn’t a ban on all anger; Jesus displayed righteous anger in the temple (John 2:13-17). But human anger, tainted by our flesh, tends toward self-justification, escalation, and sin. It rarely births the fruit of the Spirit. The tension calls us to slow down enough for the Holy Spirit to lead, rather than our adrenaline. What science reveals about anger and “hearing” Modern neuroscience echoes what James knew by inspiration. When anger flares, our brain undergoes an “amygdala hijack.” The amygdala, the brain’s alarm system tied to fight-or-flight, floods the body with adrenaline and cortisol. This redirects resources: our heart rate spikes and oxygen flows to muscles for action, but our higher reasoning centers in the prefrontal cortex – responsible for judgment, empathy, and nuanced thinking – get suppressed. In this state, our ability to truly “hear” another person diminishes dramatically. Active listening, the tool that clarifies, disarms, and seeks understanding, becomes nearly impossible. We filter everything through threat detection, empathy drops, and we stop processing the other’s words for their actual meaning. Instead, while they are still speaking we start crafting rebuttals or counterattacks. This explains why conflicts escalate so quickly: we literally cannot hear well when flooded with anger. James’ call to be slow to anger is not just spiritual wisdom; it aligns with how God designed our brains to function best when governed by self-control rather than unchecked emotion. Recognizing our physiological limits isn’t about suppressing feelings, it’s about guarding our capacity for reason so we don’t accidentally sabotage the very justice we seek to defend. Even if the other person is operating out of a completely hijacked, high-emotion state, our calling to maintain self-control and clear thinking remains. When our prefrontal cortex goes offline, our hijacked brain defaults to intellectual shortcuts. This emotional flooding is precisely what predisposes us toward constructing caricatures, like the straw man, rather than engaging with the actual person.
By Justin Renton July 9, 2026
On June 6, 1944, Allied forces stormed the beaches of Normandy. In the brutal hours that followed, the course of World War II shifted permanently. The enemy’s capacity to win had been broken. And yet, the fighting raged on for 11 more months. Soldiers still died; cities still burned. Berlin had not yet fallen. But every Allied commander knew the truth: what happened on D-Day determined what would happen on V-E Day (Victory in Europe Day). Victory was certain, even though it was not yet complete. Through his death and resurrection, Jesus Christ stormed the ultimate beach. The decisive battle against sin, death, and darkness has already been won. And yet, we are not yet living in the full experience of that victory. The war is over, and the war is still going. Not because the outcome is in doubt, but because we live between D-Day and V-E Day. This pattern – already won, not yet complete – is the “already but not yet,” and it is not a contradiction. It is the very fabric of the Christian life. As we’ve seen across this series, the fullness of God’s truth is rarely found in tidy, isolated categories. It is held in divine tension, where seemingly opposing realities coexist, each completing and guarding the other. And nowhere is that tension more vivid than in what Scripture says about our own salvation. The Biblical paradox The New Testament speaks of our adoption, redemption, salvation, sanctification, and resurrection in a way that constantly surprises us: as both accomplished facts and future hopes. This is not a theological error; it is the deliberate structure of a story that is already finished by the Author but still being written by the characters. Adoption Already: “You have received the Spirit of adoption as sons, by whom we cry, ‘Abba! Father!’” – Romans 8:15 Not yet: “We ourselves groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies.” – Romans 8:23 Redemption Already: “In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins.” – Ephesians 1:7 Not yet: “You were sealed for the day of redemption.” – Ephesians 4:30 Salvation Already: “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith.” – Ephesians 2:8 Not yet: “How much more shall we be saved from God’s wrath through him!” – Romans 5:9 Sanctification and resurrection Already: We are already sanctified in Christ and raised with him. – 1 Corinthians 1:2 and Ephesians 2:6 Not yet: We await final sanctification and the future resurrection of the dead at the last trumpet. – 1 Thessalonians 5:23–24 and 1 Corinthians 15:52 The same salvation is being described as past, present, and future. We have been saved. We are being saved. We will be saved. This is not a contradiction, it is the both/and of divine tension. Understanding the timeline To make sense of this, we need to understand how Scripture structures history. Jewish thought divided all of time into two ages: “This age” — the present age marked by sin, suffering, and death — and “the age to come,” when God would restore all things, defeat evil, and reign in fullness. The expectation was that these two ages would be strictly sequential: this age ends, the next one begins. What no one fully anticipated was that through the resurrection of Jesus and the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, the “age to come” broke into “this age” before it was over. We now live in what theologians call “the age between the ages.” The Kingdom of God has arrived, and it is still arriving.
June 21, 2026
The perfect Father chooses mercy over judgment and connection over correction, and he celebrates repentance, calling us to reflect His love and grace.
Show More